|

Pharmaceutical Brand Positioning vs. Value Proposition: What’s the Difference?

04/07/2015
SHARE
Share on linkedin
Share on twitter
Share on facebook

In our work with pharmaceutical brand teams, one of the most common points of confusion is in the difference between a brand’s ‘positioning’ and its ‘value proposition’. We have often seen marketers using these terms interchangeably, and we have sat through too many tedious meetings where teams are unable to accomplish their objectives because they could not agree on the difference.Before teams embark on defining their brand, we’ve learned that it’s important to clearly define and distinguish between positioning and value prop. Although every marketer’s definition is slightly different, the core definition often boils down to this:

  • Value Prop: The emotional and rational benefit that customers derive in purchasing a product.
  • Positioning: The product’s value proposition placed within the context of the market landscape.

These basic definitions highlight an important distinction between positioning and value prop. Namely, that the value prop is the central benefit within the brand positioning, but it is not the positioning itself. Written as a simple equation, we see that brand positioning is the value proposition placed within the context of the market landscape:

Market landscape + value prop = brand positioning
In our experience, this simple equation is a handy mnemonic that helps our clients to understand the difference between value prop and positioning.

Dan Callahan is the Founder and President of Vivisum Partners. He specializes in creating multi-phase research programs that combine quantitative, qualitative and strategic facilitation methodologies. Email Dan at dan.callahan@vivisumpartners.com
SHARE
Share on linkedin
Share on twitter
Share on facebook